ill answer thatARNU wrote:Well that is an example of "football" being played badly. Forget players and personalities, are you saying you'd prefer direct football ?Mike the Dagger wrote:We spent the first half of the season trying to "play football" which involved a series of square passes followed by Andre Boucaud putting someone under pressure, often one of the centre halves, with a short pass when they were under pressure. Worked a treat especially when we won a free kick around the half way line and turned down an opportunity to get the ball forwrd and pressure the oppo.
yes i prefer direct football all day long players fluffing around with the ball costs goals and points. center backs are there for defending not dribbling or tappy tappy football. its diff if your barcelona and brought up like that but we are not were english and we like the crunching tackle a nice long pass and a decent cross into the box. being a west ham fan you should know alot about that. poncy football like arsenal wins bugger all at our level, only 1 team since ive been at daggers played good football well and that was brentford.
getting the ball forward quickly doesnt mean launching it to a midget uptop. its putting it into a area you now your teammate will be able to receive the ball creating a attack.
you stereo typing still here as i dont see long balls hoofed aimlessly like you or a few are but i know giving players the ball who are not comfortable on it is the way to get relegated.
i know you tongue in cheek pffft post earlier about hyam being younger and impressionable was well simply bolox but i hope he learns to hoof it faster as atleast twice saturday he should of cost us a goal, 1 in first 5 mins where if he simply bangs it down the line towards winger then no danger.