Window

Discuss all matters related to Dagenham and Redbridge
Post Reply
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

Trouble with success at this level is our players appeal to other teams. We don't stand in anyone's way so I think we might lose a few at a very crucial time. Who will be off ?
Hawkins, Faye , Whitley Boucard and Doe all doing the biz for us. JMD is a loan I think but hope he dosent get recalled. That would devastate us even if just a couple went. Get ya wallet out Mr Tamplin !
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
diggerdagger1

Hear hear Arnu......but let's see if we see the £122500 due next Monday first. Then the £290000 for players stand sponsorship and board advertising.then we can worry about signing or keeping our existing players. Still strong rumours that tamplin has not given us a penny yet. Also still no sign of the clubs accounts to 30th June 2015 yet. Personally don't believe that financially its tamplin or administration. So over to you tamplin and Thompson you know how to stop all the rumours and more importantly you know what you should do. Any other decent people would act in a proper and decent manner.
User avatar
Mike the Dagger
Posts: 2307
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:09 am
Contact:

diggerdagger1 wrote:Hear hear Arnu......but let's see if we see the £122500 due next Monday first. Then the £290000 for players stand sponsorship and board advertising.then we can worry about signing or keeping our existing players. Still strong rumours that tamplin has not given us a penny yet. Also still no sign of the clubs accounts to 30th June 2015 yet. Personally don't believe that financially its tamplin or administration. So over to you tamplin and Thompson you know how to stop all the rumours and more importantly you know what you should do. Any other decent people would act in a proper and decent manner.
All that, yet you voted for Tamplin's consortium, and didn't press for full accounts to be revealed at the EGM. Did you ask what money had been paid yet last week? Did you refuse to sit down until you got an answer?
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

I didn't vote for anyone. I was not bothered either way but if he's taking over he needs to get his wallet out dosent he ?
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
Chigwellian
Posts: 620
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:18 pm

I didn't think you were a member Arnu.
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

I'm not a member. I'd probably have voted for a cash injection if I had been , given the supposed perilous financial position we may be in. The whole club is tired and needs a boost from somewhere.
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
TomMc
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:38 pm

ARNU wrote:I didn't vote for anyone. I was not bothered either way but if he's taking over he needs to get his wallet out dosent he ?
As Mike was quoting diggerdagger1, pretty sure his comments were aimed at him.
Westcliff Dagger
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:28 pm

Apparently the money is in! :D
diggerdagger1

What money?
mickeyblue
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:29 pm

but we finished 9th!
User avatar
Auntie Merge
Posts: 2193
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm

I read the statement and part of it seems odd
This has been accepted as an advanced non-refundable payment made as part of each investor's proposed investment in D&R 2016 Ltd, to be paid to D&R FC Ltd but to be noted in the books of D&R 2016 Ltd.
As I read it, the investors have paid over a non refundable payment ...
Into the investors account; not to the club. Or am I misunderstanding something?
Surely if the amount is non refundable it should go to the club and stay there until after the
takeover has been completed.
Adrian
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:09 pm

There's a difference between where the cash ends up and where the investment is recorded.
The investment can't be recorded in the club as it currently stands because it's limited by guarantee.
Post Reply