Page 1 of 4
Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:18 pm
by HGDagger
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:14 pm
by Auntie Merge
He was fined a total of £45,000 and ordered to pay £30,789 towards the cost of the investigation and prosecution.
The Judge set a period of 9 months imprisonment in default if the fine is not paid within 3 months.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 7:46 am
by Diggerthedog
Dear FA......
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:23 am
by RayleighDagger1986
Will this be raised on Wednesday night at the fans forum?
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:32 am
by Alan
Oh very dear.
"Area the size of a football pitch" - hang on, we have an area the size of a football pitch...
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:37 am
by Mark
Is his behaviour a pattern yet or is posting this still petty?
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:41 am
by grumpy old git
Never mind the fit and proper test surely you have to question the sanity of someone who turns his back garden into a landfill site.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:10 am
by Alan
Having a quick look at the EFL Fit and Proper person test and I don't think that this conviction would disqualify him as it's not one of dishonesty or one of the specified classes of offences.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:11 am
by Auntie Merge
Alan wrote:Having a quick look at the EFL Fit and Proper person test and I don't think that this conviction would disqualify him as it's not one of dishonesty or one of the specified classes of offences.
The national league comes under the FA fit and proper person test, but I fear you might be right.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:27 am
by Alan
It is rather surprising.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:23 am
by NBDag
At least it was his own land and not someone else's, I suppose. Just pay up, learn your lesson and move on.
Silly of him and his partner really- but he's not the first to do it and he won't be the last.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:57 am
by Auntie Merge
NBDag wrote:At least it was his own land and not someone else's, I suppose. Just pay up, learn your lesson and move on.
Silly of him and his partner really- but he's not the first to do it and he won't be the last.
It isn't the first time he has breached environmental standards - the other time was with the council in respect of noise.
http://www.romfordrecorder.co.uk/news/p ... _1_3902688
Do we really want someone who is quite happy to shit on his doorstep as Chairman/owner of the Daggers?
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:17 pm
by NBDag
I didn't say it was the first time? How someone keeps their home is no concern of mine. He'd probably think that half of the houses of people on here are shit holes, but who cares.
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 1:26 pm
by Auntie Merge
NBDag wrote:I didn't say it was the first time? How someone keeps their home is no concern of mine. He'd probably think that half of the houses of people on here are shit holes, but who cares.
But you DID say
Just pay up, learn your lesson and move on.
He doesn't appear to be learning any lessons does he?
Re: Tamplin fined £45,000 for dumping waste
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:01 pm
by NBDag
Auntie Merge wrote:NBDag wrote:I didn't say it was the first time? How someone keeps their home is no concern of mine. He'd probably think that half of the houses of people on here are shit holes, but who cares.
But you DID say
Just pay up, learn your lesson and move on.
He doesn't appear to be learning any lessons does he?
Yes I DID say that. But he hasn't done this before? Noise complaints with another business is not flytipping or whatever it is he's done on his land. He's done something wrong, he'll pay the price for it. Thats the end of it. Has nothing to do with his ownership abilities of Dagenham. Judge him on the job he's doing here.