The Independent Dagenham and Redbridge forum
https://viewsfromthesieve.co.uk/
I thought it was a bit dubious at the time.Having watched it back I don't know how DN2 fan sees it as deliberate.That blokes never wrong either,strange things happen I s'pose. :DLcbdagger wrote:Seen the highlights again and still not having that as being a deliberate handball for the penalty
22, I know, I said that. What's your point?Lcbdagger wrote:So 22 then? What a curious argument on a thread when the facts are there??matt_drfc wrote:We have 24 players at the moment, including 4 loanees. With 2 players coming back from their loans. 22 players.
My response wasn't aimed at your post Matt... more the responsematt_drfc wrote:22, I know, I said that. What's your point?Lcbdagger wrote:So 22 then? What a curious argument on a thread when the facts are there??matt_drfc wrote:We have 24 players at the moment, including 4 loanees. With 2 players coming back from their loans. 22 players.
Because this is the Matrix, we are all really still on the old forum... and the ghost of Adrian runs wildARNU wrote:I thought it was a bit dubious at the time.Having watched it back I don't know how DN2 fan sees it as deliberate.That blokes never wrong either,strange things happen I s'pose. :DLcbdagger wrote:Seen the highlights again and still not having that as being a deliberate handball for the penalty
Oh right lolLcbdagger wrote:My response wasn't aimed at your post Matt... more the responsematt_drfc wrote:22, I know, I said that. What's your point?Lcbdagger wrote:So 22 then? What a curious argument on a thread when the facts are there??
Why do I have to talk about the players coming back? I didn't talk about players going back to parent clubs, I talked about not keeping loanees, which for as far as I'm concerned includes those we've brought in and those we've sent out. Maybe I should have said any player that has been loaned in or out, just to keep you happy?matt_drfc wrote: So if you talk about those players that go back to their parent clubs, you have to talk about the ones coming back to us. Regardless if they're out of contract, Hines is out of contract at the end of the season but you included him.
And Anderson is dual-registered with us and Grays, so yes.
The player clearly moves his hand away from his body into the path of the ball before Norris hits the shot. The referee could have given a penalty for the player having his arm around Norris' neck anyway.SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:Penalty coild have gone either way. People only making opinion after a second look,something the poor Ref dont get. Thought he had a good game all in all. We ask for consistant refereeing and if you look back at the two given against Brian Shah this season he was at least that.
Apologies for misinterpreting what you said.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote:Why do I have to talk about the players coming back? I didn't talk about players going back to parent clubs, I talked about not keeping loanees, which for as far as I'm concerned includes those we've brought in and those we've sent out. Maybe I should have said any player that has been loaned in or out, just to keep you happy?matt_drfc wrote: So if you talk about those players that go back to their parent clubs, you have to talk about the ones coming back to us. Regardless if they're out of contract, Hines is out of contract at the end of the season but you included him.
And Anderson is dual-registered with us and Grays, so yes.
I may have included Hines, but that was because he was then specifically mentioned.
I can't see why you'd bother counting a player who isn't even mentioned on our website in Anderson, except to be pedantic. Ah, there we go then.
Don't think soARNU wrote:Is Darren Currie still registered to play ??