Re: Daily Mail
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:12 am
It's all totally factual and well researched, for example https://twitter.com/_CarltonCole9/statu ... 7915747328
The Independent Dagenham and Redbridge forum
https://viewsfromthesieve.co.uk/
I agree with this. The article would have to be never ending to cover all of what has happened. But is a fair enough reflection.
Really??Mike the Dagger wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:12 am It's all totally factual and well researched, for example https://twitter.com/_CarltonCole9/statu ... 7915747328
A well respected national newspaper? The Daily Mail, and particularly their website Mail online?Chigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:18 amReally??Mike the Dagger wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:12 am It's all totally factual and well researched, for example https://twitter.com/_CarltonCole9/statu ... 7915747328
This is an online account... NOT a well respected national newspaper
With all due respect....If you believe online accounts for one minute, then you aren't as smart as you think you are
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... wards.htmlChigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:18 am
Really??
This is an online account... NOT a well respected national newspaper
With all due respect....If you believe online accounts for one minute, then you aren't as smart as you think you are
The Daily Mail has got the second highest readership behind The Sun.... So yes, Well Respected newspaper...Auntie Merge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:32 amA well respected national newspaper? The Daily Mail, and particularly their website Mail online?Chigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:18 amReally??Mike the Dagger wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:12 am It's all totally factual and well researched, for example https://twitter.com/_CarltonCole9/statu ... 7915747328
This is an online account... NOT a well respected national newspaper
With all due respect....If you believe online accounts for one minute, then you aren't as smart as you think you are
Coffee over keyboard moment. :eek:
That is the funniest thing I have heard in ages.
In recent years the Daily Mail really has become king of the gutter press. They operate a print first and amend later policy.
Well sold newspaper, not well respected.Chigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:52 amThe Daily Mail has got the second highest readership behind The Sun.... So yes, Well Respected newspaper...Auntie Merge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:32 amA well respected national newspaper? The Daily Mail, and particularly their website Mail online?Chigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:18 am
Really??
This is an online account... NOT a well respected national newspaper
With all due respect....If you believe online accounts for one minute, then you aren't as smart as you think you are
Coffee over keyboard moment. :eek:
That is the funniest thing I have heard in ages.
In recent years the Daily Mail really has become king of the gutter press. They operate a print first and amend later policy.
You sure?.... If you didn't respect a newspaper, surely you wouldn't buy it!!Auntie Merge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:55 amWell sold newspaper, not well respected.Chigwellian wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:52 amThe Daily Mail has got the second highest readership behind The Sun.... So yes, Well Respected newspaper...Auntie Merge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:32 am
A well respected national newspaper? The Daily Mail, and particularly their website Mail online?
Coffee over keyboard moment. :eek:
That is the funniest thing I have heard in ages.
In recent years the Daily Mail really has become king of the gutter press. They operate a print first and amend later policy.
Enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
They are not extremely careful not to report false details. They print what they think will generate the most circulation and click bait.Chigwellian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:01 pmThey are extremely careful not to report 'false' details. We have stringent laws in this country.Alan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:16 pm Having been sat at the table on Saturday when the journalist spoke to Mike, I know he spent 15 minutes or so speaking to the journalist and Mike did talk about mistakes made by the club to get into this situation - the journalist has picked out the bits that fitted the story he wanted to write.
They have reported what was fed to them.
Do you think the Mail just spoke to Mike?Auntie Merge wrote: ↑Tue Apr 24, 2018 12:35 pm Going back to your original comment
They are not extremely careful not to report false details. They print what they think will generate the most circulation and click bait.Chigwellian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:01 pmThey are extremely careful not to report 'false' details. We have stringent laws in this country.Alan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:16 pm Having been sat at the table on Saturday when the journalist spoke to Mike, I know he spent 15 minutes or so speaking to the journalist and Mike did talk about mistakes made by the club to get into this situation - the journalist has picked out the bits that fitted the story he wanted to write.
They have reported what was fed to them.
They chose the angle for the Daggers story that they thought would get the most discussion. Saying the situation with the flags is resolved does not sell more newspapers.