Supporters Club Rep on the Main Club Board

Discuss all matters related to Dagenham and Redbridge
Daggernewbie
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:37 pm

Adrian wrote:
Daggernewbie wrote:
Adrian wrote:Can someone tell me why committees are set up in the first place?
Same reason why boards are set up.
Which is?
Surely you know why boards are set up.
Adrian
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:09 pm

Daggernewbie wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Daggernewbie wrote: Same reason why boards are set up.
Which is?
Surely you know why boards are set up.
Can you tell me or not?
Daggernewbie
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:37 pm

Ok Adrian the board sit there talk about things and vote on things if necessary.
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

What is a supporters club for? What is their purpose?
I've managed to support the daggers seriously for about 10 years now and other than the occasional coach trip to an away match ( most grateful to Russell and all the others who clearly give their time and effort) I think I've been able to get on with it without crossing its path.
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
canveydagger
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 8:44 pm

There are only 3 or 4 people on the supporters club committee that i would want to represent the supporters club at broad meeting, if Mr R Elmes does not want to do then i think the person who has been put forward is quiet a good choice, and would have been one of my other choices , he always at the supporters club meetings, I'm just glad that someone else from the supporters club committee did not get it.
canveydagger
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 8:44 pm

Since my last post on this matter it as been bought to my attention by a few fellow fans, supporters club committee and other people, that Russell Elmes would have liked the chance to have been the supporters club rep on the main club board. If this is the case maybe Russell should have got the position as he is the supporters club chairman and already dears with Mr Thompson, Mr Hopkins, Mr Gwinn and other people who work at the club.
dagger4eva
Posts: 1735
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:39 pm

If this is correct then I'd happen to agree that Russell should have been given the opportunity to accept or decline the position in the first instance - or at the very least been consulted on who he, as chairman of the SC wished to nominate as representative.

I've no idea who has been selected but wouldn't be surprised if it's another henchman of Kim Jung Un Thompson...
User avatar
ThatRoundThing
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:40 am

I suspect the supporters club rep was already a full member of the club, as well as a Supporters Club Committee member. Although imo, should not have been a necessary qualifying factor.
Daggernewbie
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:37 pm

ThatRoundThing wrote:I suspect the supporters club rep was already a full member of the club, as well as a Supporters Club Committee member. Although imo, should not have been a necessary qualifying factor.
No the elected rep is not a full member he`s only on the committee
Daggernewbie
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:37 pm

dagger4eva wrote:If this is correct then I'd happen to agree that Russell should have been given the opportunity to accept or decline the position in the first instance - or at the very least been consulted on who he, as chairman of the SC wished to nominate as representative.

I've no idea who has been selected but wouldn't be surprised if it's another henchman of Kim Jung Un Thompson...
No the person is not a henchman of Thompson
Phippo
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:05 pm

Going back to the original posters observations, I'm puzzled! Just how "unanimous" was the vote? Did Russell not get a vote?
Chigwellian
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:18 pm

Who was allowed to vote?
diggerdagger1

Dagger new is......are you a member of the supporters club committee?
diggerdagger1

Oops! Should have said daggernewbie sorry!!!
Post Reply