dagger4eva wrote:I don't particularly see any problem in principle with the naming of people. I'm sure said people are big enough to defend themselves on here or wherever, just as Steve has done by coming on to that podcast.
I am mindful however that whilst there was a lot of probably valid explanation for recent events, and a few sympathy votes won over, there was in the same breath a big deflection effort away from the real issues of how the board have managed to get us in such a sorry state, not for the 1st time.
He managed to shift away almost all responsibility of the situation we're in, away from the board and put on to the heads of the support or at least a section of it.
As Mike implied in his article, once this situation has been rectified the entire board need to take a long hard look and consider there positions. Every one of them.
To quote John Still when he returned to just over 2 years ago...
"What the f*cking hell has happened to this club"
Agree 100% D4E
I probably made my point badly but what I meant was that by naming at least three opponents Thommo can't or won't see that this is likely to prolong the squabbling
D4E and others are right when they say that the real reason that we find ourselves in this position are decisions taken two or three seasons back which led to the need to abandon Members ownership which resulted in the club being at the mercy of an owner's whim