Page 2 of 2

Re: Hemel (A)

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2026 8:21 pm
by Ally Fraser
Is there any reason for us being a professional full time football team? Pathetic today. Arctic conditions. Happy New Year

Re: Hemel (A)

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2026 10:39 pm
by RampantDuke
That’s part of the problem. As we all know from experience, the best part time players are usually much better than the worst professionals and that’s what we’re seeing now. We must be the lowest ranked professional team in the country now and all we are doing now is giving some of the dregs of pro football a final pay day. We need to get back to what we were always good at, bringing young exciting players through and selling them to Peterborough. Instead we’re catching s**t on their way down. If the rumours of us losing our funding at the end of the season are true then we need a complete reset which means a part time team of young and hungry local lads.

Re: Hemel (A)

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:44 pm
by BB-Dagger
I’m a bit puzzled by the post match comments by our illustrious leader, he said that the threat posed by Hemel was identified before the game so it was disappointing the way we conceded, we had a real go but were missing the end product!
Now please bear with me when I say that defensively we were lacking yesterday, and we were absolutely crap defending when they scored, did we have a real go? One attempt on target and that trickled through to a keeper who was astonishingly bad, last 5 minutes we had the majority of the possession but continuously passed it around the back and let them “park the bus” no effort to “have areal go” at all. The only part of his post match interview that he got right was that it was bloody freezing. What bloody game was he at? He should take a look at the post match interview of the west ham manager, he accepted they were shit and gave an apology to the traveling supporters, Bradbury is totally devoid of any logic in his tactics or response.