Page 4 of 5
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:04 pm
by Pondfield Dagger
lucky boys...southport nearly nicked it there in injury time...
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:12 pm
by SUSSEX DAGGER
What a time to fail to do what we have at least manage to do most of the season, score.
Looks prime for TV coverage now in the replay.
Honestly should not be worried but I am
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:15 pm
by Adrian
Well that was a waste of money and time.
Utter garbage.
A change must happen.
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:51 pm
by Hardy1
SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:What a time to fail to do what we have at least manage to do most of the season, score.
Looks prime for TV coverage now in the replay.
Honestly should not be worried but I am
Not sure why anyone would cover the replay, six other draws today and a good load more matches tomorrow.
Shambolic performance today...
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:58 pm
by matt_drfc
We will be on TV, they love a non league side at home v league side away, as it stands, we are the only game that applies to.
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:14 pm
by chasthedagger
I have not been to any games this season due to various reasons, mainly the negative posts re, team performances so far.
So as it was reduced prices I thought I would have a look for myself, well I can now understand the reasons behind those posts, what complete and utter garbage that was, the worst team I have seen wearing a dagenham shirt for as long as they have been in both the conference and the football league ie the last ten years.
There is no passion or fire shown from the manager and that shows in the team unless this team shows some of that they will be relegated, and on todays showing will struggle in the conference.
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:40 pm
by Pondfield Dagger
highlights already up
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29971030
cousins what a keeper!!!!
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:34 pm
by Dagger83
54 seconds of 'highlights', none of which were particularly great chances. Was it really that bad?
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:37 pm
by dagger4eva
Yes !!
Re: southport
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:51 pm
by Dagger83
I'm glad I saved my £10 and spent some time with my nephew in that case then.
Re: southport
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:01 am
by Auntie Merge
Dagger83 wrote:I'm glad I saved my £10 and spent some time with my nephew in that case then.
me too!
my nephew was a super sub this morning, his team were losing 2-0 before he came on, and apparently his goals changed the game and his side won 6-4. He is only 9 but i think we should sign him up!
Re: southport
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 1:16 am
by Diggerthedog
Did not go today but we all knew the outcome. Wayne is a very good coach at football but has failed to turn that into manager material, have tweeted him exactly that.
Time to move on from the current set up and try again.
Re: southport
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:36 am
by Adrian
Dagger83 wrote:54 seconds of 'highlights', none of which were particularly great chances. Was it really that bad?
It was worse.
Re: southport
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:41 am
by Richie
Adrian wrote:Dagger83 wrote:54 seconds of 'highlights', none of which were particularly great chances. Was it really that bad?
It was worse.
I can only think of Howell's near miss at the start of the 2nd half and Murphy's shot at the end. They had a header and that late shot.
Re: southport
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:16 pm
by Crushed Dreams
I'm afraid it was very much as I expected, although I half expected us to lose.
The whole thing reminds of my first game D&R v Runcorn, 20 April 1996. Few fans, no atmosphere, poor team and relegation more or less a certainty.
Didn't stop me going to the next home game and it won't this time either.