Page 1 of 1

Chesham [h]

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2025 9:58 pm
by len
Couldn't make game tonight but sounded impressive that we managed to win the game by bringing on our attacking players after Chesham equalised in second half and looked in the ascendancy.
As they said in commentary a game we would have probably lost a couple of months ago.

Re: Chesham [h]

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2025 10:29 pm
by NBDag
We definitely would have lost that a few weeks ago. So the fact we haven’t is a big positive, I think everyone played well today and Maghoma, Lusala and the front two were all very impressive.

What I am still frustrated by is how easily we scored two simply because we tried to win by attacking and using the strength that we have in that department. It’s still clear that our game plan is to score and sit back and try and see it out. It won’t work against better opposition, and it definitely won’t work against any opposition with this young lad in goal.

Play like the first and last 15 minutes and we will be a team that wins often and convincingly more often than any other result.

Re: Chesham [h]

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2025 11:40 pm
by DAGGER2003
Weren’t there tonight but another good win. Seemed to play well first half sat back til their goal and then went for it. Another big three points. Think by new year we will know where we are at playing the better teams in the division. Thought Saturday was the first time we saw patterns of play and looked a decent side.

Re: Chesham [h]

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2025 10:41 am
by RM1Dagger
It was frustrating we didn't put the game away after a really bright start to the second half and then we once again became quite passive, and when they equalised (despite not really creating much) I wasn't surprised. But fair enough a great response and got the job done. Tactics seem to be developing beyond a long punt to AC, but nevertheless he is developing into a real spearhead for us and more. Hopefully he stays fit.

Re: Chesham [h]

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2025 4:43 pm
by Daggerfrom70s
I would suggest that the arrival of a new assistant may have added new ideas together with organisation and perhaps freed up the manager to actually manage. Long way to go but at least a decent position away from the bottom 4 places. Testing times ahead when the top teams come along.

Re: Chesham [h]

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2025 6:20 pm
by Corinthian
I thought we controlled the game, and played some very good and exciting football. Lots of energy, combativeness and creativity. Just before the equaliser ,which was unfortunately in my view wan error from the substitute goalie, we started to lose the midfield and if I have a criticism I believe the substitutions should have been made earlier . Nit picking on a very good performance. COYD