Page 1 of 1
Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:53 pm
by Mike the Dagger
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31844562
"We tried to win but the moment they had 10 men we felt too much pressure."
Has anyone ever seen Wayne Burnett and Jose Mourinho in the same room???
Re: Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:12 pm
by The Romford Dagger
Thisll make Wayne Burninho believe he had a point..
Re: Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:06 pm
by lupins
He did as anyone who saw the game ought to acknowledge
Going down to 10 totally changes the dynamic of the game and there is no general evidence that 11 versus10 means a win to the 11
Re: Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:14 pm
by The Romford Dagger
lupins wrote:He did as anyone who saw the game ought to acknowledge
Going down to 10 totally changes the dynamic of the game and there is no general evidence that 11 versus10 means a win to the 11
m
No but he tried to claim that the moment the red card came.. It was a disadvantage to US as it was harder.. Mental
Re: Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:54 am
by Chigwellian
The Romford Dagger wrote:lupins wrote:He did as anyone who saw the game ought to acknowledge
Going down to 10 totally changes the dynamic of the game and there is no general evidence that 11 versus10 means a win to the 11
No but he tried to claim that the moment the red card came.. It was a disadvantage to US as it was harder.. Mental
..... Yet the previous week, when Shrewsbury went down to 10 men, Burnett said that they had the advantage of being a man down.... The week later when we went down to 10 men against Southport, he said the complete opposite, and said how we bossed the game up until we went down to 10, and then they had the advantage of having an extra man.... very contrary!!
Re: Are you Burnett in disguise....
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:57 am
by Mike the Dagger
lupins wrote:He did as anyone who saw the game ought to acknowledge
Going down to 10 totally changes the dynamic of the game and there is no general evidence that 11 versus10 means a win to the 11
Agree there is no guarantee of anything in sport, but to claim that you are at a disadvantage having an extra man on the field is disingenuous in the extreme. In football the theory of playing against ten is pretty simple, keep posession and make the pitch big.
For a lot of the season we also could have said that going in front was a disadvantage as we seemed to have an uncanny ability to chuck away a lead (which resurfaced against Burton recently). Again, totally disingenuous as actually the whole point of the game is to score more than your opponent and therefore at some point you have to take the lead to do so.
The problem is/was we couldn't defend once the opposition had nothing to lose and "went for it", not anything more complex than that. Partially solved by benching Brian Saah.